<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wikidot="http://www.wikidot.com/rss-namespace">

	<channel>
		<title>Per page discussions (new threads)</title>
		<link>http://www.noooxml.org/forum/c-9577/per-page-discussions</link>
		<description>Threads in the forum category &quot;Per page discussions&quot; - This category groups discussions related to particular pages within this site.</description>
				<copyright></copyright>
		<lastBuildDate></lastBuildDate>
		
					<item>
				<guid>http://www.noooxml.org/forum/t-51040</guid>
				<title>Ecma - a case study for vendor capture</title>
				<link>http://www.noooxml.org/forum/t-51040/ecma-a-case-study-for-vendor-capture</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 06:31:20 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>Phil Lello</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>157284</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>The quotes from the <a href="http://newsbreaks.infotoday.com/nbreader.asp?ArticleID=16059" >November 2005 article</a> are misleading. From the same article:</p> <blockquote> <p>Farquhar says that that effort is not directly related to the Open XML announcement: "Some people think we are adopting Microsoft formats as our standard for digital preservation. This is not right; we are striving to make sure that content we receive in MS formats will be preserved." He continued: "What format will we deliver? We deliver a lot of articles and in many formats. We deliver content in PDF, Office Open, ODF, TIFF —whatever format the customer wants."</p> </blockquote> <p>Until I read that, your article had given me the disturbing impression that the British Library was standardising on OOXML - essentially making MS Office their standard. In light of the quote I've used, I'm hopeful that they're just going to use it as a 'standard' they import from, much as OpenOffice imports from a variety of formats.<br /> I just hope that things haven't changed in the time sime then…</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://www.noooxml.org/forum/t-47944</guid>
				<title>20 good reasons to disapprove OOXML</title>
				<link>http://www.noooxml.org/forum/t-47944/20-good-reasons-to-disapprove-ooxml</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 22:45:08 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>hbd</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>100599</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>There are several press releases on the Web that say: until March 31 those NBs that voted No in September can revert their vote to Yes. There is very little said that an NB can change its vote from Yes to No or from Abstain to No. I suggest that sites that advise to disapprove OOXML (including this site) should pay much more attention to promoting the NB's right to change its vote to NO. Articles regarding this right and reasons to use this right should be posted.</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://www.noooxml.org/forum/t-18634</guid>
				<title>Results of the OOXML Ballot of 2nd September</title>
				<link>http://www.noooxml.org/forum/t-18634/results-of-the-ooxml-ballot-of-2nd-september</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 05:59:48 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>201.208.189.251</wikidot:authorName>								<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>CUBA approved the standard</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
				</channel>
</rss>