<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wikidot="http://www.wikidot.com/rss-namespace">

	<channel>
		<title>Hungarian Standards Body: no official position on OOXML</title>
		<link>http://www.noooxml.org/forum/t-18217/hungarian-standards-body:no-official-position-on-ooxml</link>
		<description>Posts in the discussion thread &quot;Hungarian Standards Body: no official position on OOXML&quot; - The repeated voting session again was not legitimate, because it was not the secretary but the general manager who sent out the invitation letters.</description>
				<copyright></copyright>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 08:59:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		
					<item>
				<guid>http://www.noooxml.org/forum/t-18217#post-45262</guid>
				<title>Hungarian Standards Body: no official position on OOXML</title>
				<link>http://www.noooxml.org/forum/t-18217/hungarian-standards-body:no-official-position-on-ooxml#post-45262</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Fri, 31 Aug 2007 15:29:28 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>Anonymous</wikidot:authorName>								<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>The repeated voting session again was not legitimate, because it was not the secretary but the general manager who sent out the invitation letters, which should be breaching the internal rules of the Standards Body. The number of members to vote raised from about ten to 55, 42 of which were present at the session. Microsoft did not want to vote, but they wanted to let the previous voting session be recognised as legitimate, because they claim the intervention of the minister after the previous session to repeat the voting session was not valid. The result is: no official position, due to the lack of time to organise a new voting session.</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
				</channel>
</rss>
