<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wikidot="http://www.wikidot.com/rss-namespace">

	<channel>
		<title>Korea, No with comments to OOXML</title>
		<link>http://www.noooxml.org/forum/t-18392/korea-no-with-comments-to-ooxml</link>
		<description>Posts in the discussion thread &quot;Korea, No with comments to OOXML&quot; - Korea Committee voted &quot;No with comments&quot; to Office Open XML as P member body. Mr. Youngsik Kang, Korea Agency for Technology and Standards, one of ISO/JTC-1 members confimed voting result to ISO on August, 31th after collection the public opinion from various experts, companies and government in Korea.</description>
				<copyright></copyright>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 09:15:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		
					<item>
				<guid>http://www.noooxml.org/forum/t-18392#post-45822</guid>
				<title>Ireland, No With comments</title>
				<link>http://www.noooxml.org/forum/t-18392/korea-no-with-comments-to-ooxml#post-45822</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 13:24:16 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>Anonymous</wikidot:authorName>								<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>Got it from <a href="http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/95383">http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/95383</a><br /> Link to NSAI Publication: <a href="http://www.nsai.ie/index.cfm/area/news/action/article/information/xml">http://www.nsai.ie/index.cfm/area/news/action/article/information/xml</a></p> <p>Another article i stumbeled upon: <a href="http://www.heise.de/open/artikel/95214">http://www.heise.de/open/artikel/95214</a><br /> Last Paragraph translated (emphasis mine):<br /> "Standardisation competition? The request of the Federal Government (pdf) speaks of the <strong>competition between products on basis of open standards, not of competition between standards</strong>. Competitive standards, it spontaneously reminds me of the current Hickhack between Blu-ray Disc and HD DVD, which is not favorable to the establishment of a DVD successor. But probably two standards are still better than none…"</p> <p>-gml</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://www.noooxml.org/forum/t-18392#post-45754</guid>
				<title>Korea, No with comments to OOXML</title>
				<link>http://www.noooxml.org/forum/t-18392/korea-no-with-comments-to-ooxml#post-45754</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 08:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>Anonymous</wikidot:authorName>								<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>September, 3th. ISO JTC-1 Korea Committee voted "No with comments" to Office Open XML as P member body. Mr. Youngsik Kang, Korea Agency for Technology and Standards, one of ISO/JTC-1 members confimed voting result to ISO on August, 31th after collection the public opinion from various experts, companies and government in Korea.</p> <p>Korean government concluded that OOXML is incomplete for ISO standards right now and suggested some of complements for that. These comments will be public after ISO voting finally. These conditions must be adopted by ECMA TC45 till Febrary in next year likewise Dannish and Norway's.</p> <p>Sourced by first report by Inews24, online Korean IT daily- a reporter Eunseung Kang, <a href="http://www.inews24.com/php/news_view.php?g_serial=281047">http://www.inews24.com/php/news_view.php?g_serial=281047</a>. As following is the brief translation of this article by Seokchan (Channy) Yun <a href="http://channy.creation.net/antiooxml/korea-no-ooxml.html">http://channy.creation.net/antiooxml/korea-no-ooxml.html</a></p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
				</channel>
</rss>
