<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wikidot="http://www.wikidot.com/rss-namespace">

	<channel>
		<title>Richard Stallman on OOXML</title>
		<link>http://www.noooxml.org/forum/t-19513/richard-stallman-on-ooxml</link>
		<description>Posts in the discussion thread &quot;Richard Stallman on OOXML&quot; - Richard Stallman is known for his strong opinions and sure he has his say on OOXML, too.</description>
				<copyright></copyright>
		<lastBuildDate></lastBuildDate>
		
					<item>
				<guid>http://www.noooxml.org/forum/t-19513#post-48559</guid>
				<title>Richard Stallman on OOXML</title>
				<link>http://www.noooxml.org/forum/t-19513/richard-stallman-on-ooxml#post-48559</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 20:29:02 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>podmokle</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>3547</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p><a href="http://www.pcworld.idg.com.au/index.php/id;211669437;pp;4">http://www.pcworld.idg.com.au/index.php/id;211669437;pp;4</a></p> <blockquote> <p>"Microsoft has frequently imposed non-interoperability; now, for example, it promotes the patented bogus "standard" OOXML instead of supporting Open Document Format. Microsoft believes it is so powerful that it can design an incompatible format, create obstacles to its implementation by others, and pressure most users to switch to it. Do you think users are really as foolish as Microsoft predicts?"</p> </blockquote> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
				</channel>
</rss>