<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wikidot="http://www.wikidot.com/rss-namespace">

	<channel>
		<title>More Choice</title>
		<link>http://www.noooxml.org/forum/t-41210/more-choice</link>
		<description>Posts in the discussion thread &quot;More Choice&quot; - Choice between standards is becoming the latest defense. However the choice advocacy is contradictory.</description>
				<copyright></copyright>
		<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 08:41:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		
					<item>
				<guid>http://www.noooxml.org/forum/t-41210#post-108651</guid>
				<title>Re: More Choice</title>
				<link>http://www.noooxml.org/forum/t-41210/more-choice#post-108651</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Sun, 17 Feb 2008 14:01:47 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>podmokle</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>3547</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>The fact that they don't support to chose ODF is a clear indication of their intentions.</p> <p>I guess the users were excited when they totally changed the interface of the software.</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://www.noooxml.org/forum/t-41210#post-106881</guid>
				<title>Re: More Choice</title>
				<link>http://www.noooxml.org/forum/t-41210/more-choice#post-106881</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 23:36:03 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>stegu</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>30391</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>The way Microsoft has set up the playing field, there is indeed some real choice for end users here, and that is: do you a) want to keep using MS Office and be locked into using <em>only</em> Microsoft Office, or do you b) want to use anything else <em>except</em> MS Office and be able to switch between alternatives without problems? The answer to that question just might not be what Microsoft expects.</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
					<item>
				<guid>http://www.noooxml.org/forum/t-41210#post-106836</guid>
				<title>More Choice</title>
				<link>http://www.noooxml.org/forum/t-41210/more-choice#post-106836</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 21:12:43 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>arebenti</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>36024</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>Governments are asked by Microsoft to offer <strong>choice</strong> between multiple standards. In other words it means that a <strong>decision</strong> on the use of standards will be made on a hierarchical level where the public procurement agency can exercise less power.</p> <p>On the other hand it is notable that the choice propaganda is just unilateral. Microsoft does not offer customers of their products to choose between ODF and OOXML. Yes, I know there is a plugin, but it does not count as it's no native support.</p> <blockquote> <p>“We don’t think ODF is good enough for our users,”</p> </blockquote> <p>is Tom Robertson (Microsoft) quoted.</p> <blockquote> <p>“Uniformity is not always a good thing,” said Tsilas. “At the end of the day, we should have a more dynamic market, and live in a world of ‘and,’ not ‘either/or.’”</p> </blockquote> <p>So why doesn't the vendor offer its customers the <strong>choice</strong> in its own Office products? The fact is that governments who deliberately choose ODF will force Microsoft to offer more choice.</p> <p><a href="http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/breakingnews/infotech/view/20080123-114312/Microsoft-changes-heart-gives-market-choice-with-openXML">http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/breakingnews/infotech/view/20080123-114312/Microsoft-changes-heart-gives-market-choice-with-openXML</a></p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
				</channel>
</rss>
