<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wikidot="http://www.wikidot.com/rss-namespace">

	<channel>
		<title>SFLC: Microsoft&#039;s Open Specification Promise: No Assurance for GPL</title>
		<link>http://www.noooxml.org/forum/t-46501/sflc:microsoft-s-open-specification-promise:no-assurance-for-gpl</link>
		<description>Posts in the discussion thread &quot;SFLC: Microsoft&#039;s Open Specification Promise: No Assurance for GPL&quot; - The Software Freedom Law Center has analyzed Microsoft&#039;s &quot;Open Specification Promise&quot; that accompanies OOXML and found it seriously lacking for FOSS developers.</description>
				<copyright></copyright>
		<lastBuildDate></lastBuildDate>
		
					<item>
				<guid>http://www.noooxml.org/forum/t-46501#post-123919</guid>
				<title>SFLC: Microsoft&#039;s Open Specification Promise: No Assurance for GPL</title>
				<link>http://www.noooxml.org/forum/t-46501/sflc:microsoft-s-open-specification-promise:no-assurance-for-gpl#post-123919</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 20:36:22 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>ggiedke</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>32664</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>as discussed in detail in the analysis, OSP</p> <ul> <li>is irrevocable but only for now</li> <li>covers specifications, not code</li> <li>has no consistency with the GPL</li> </ul> <p><a href="http://www.softwarefreedom.org/resources/2008/osp-gpl.html">http://www.softwarefreedom.org/resources/2008/osp-gpl.html</a></p> <p>Groklaw has the text also and some commentary:<br /> <a href="http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20080312151954507">http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20080312151954507</a></p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
				</channel>
</rss>