<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wikidot="http://www.wikidot.com/rss-namespace">

	<channel>
		<title>EU processes Danish complaint</title>
		<link>http://www.noooxml.org/forum/t-55481/eu-processes-danish-complaint</link>
		<description>Posts in the discussion thread &quot;EU processes Danish complaint&quot; - Procurement rules are supposed to be performance based. Mandatory standards as a MS Office 2007 format do not fit. And what about a format as OOXML which official justification is backwards compatibility to the products of a single vendor? a distortion of competition?</description>
				<copyright></copyright>
		<lastBuildDate></lastBuildDate>
		
					<item>
				<guid>http://www.noooxml.org/forum/t-55481#post-151954</guid>
				<title>EU processes Danish complaint</title>
				<link>http://www.noooxml.org/forum/t-55481/eu-processes-danish-complaint#post-151954</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 22:25:34 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>podmokle</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>3547</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>The European Commission confirmed that it investigates Danish procurement rules following a complaint from the Danish Unix User Group. It is under examination at DG Markt. The complaint relates to a non-performance related mandatory use of OOXML.</p> <blockquote> <p>The Danish Unix User Group DKUUG has made a formal complaint to the EU commission over the Danish state, for breach of the EC Treaty article 81 on unfair competition.</p> <p>The complaint concerns the internal regulation in the Danish state to prescribe the use of a mandatory standard, namely the specification ECMA-376 or ISO/IEC DIS 29500 OOXML, which describes a format that is used in the Microsoft Office 2007 product.</p> </blockquote> <blockquote> <p>The stated goal of ECMA 376 is:<br /> "The goal is to enable the implementation of the Office Open XML formats by the widest set of tools and<br /> platforms, fostering interoperability across office productivity applications and line-of-business systems, as well<br /> as to support and strengthen document archival and preservation, all in a way that is fully compatible with the<br /> large existing investments in Microsoft Office documents."<br /> (from ECMA-376 Introduction, page 12).<br /> <a href="http://www.ecma-international.org/publications/standards/Ecma-376.htm">http://www.ecma-international.org/publications/standards/Ecma-376.htm</a><br /> Thus the ECMA 376 specification favours a specific product of a specific company.<br /> The Danish state represented by ITST has made ECMA 376 mandatory from the 1 of January 2008 for cartain procurements in the Danish state, thus making the procurement unacceptably favouring a specific company and their product, and setting their competitors in the field of office software at a competitive disadvantage.</p> </blockquote> <ul> <li><a href="http://www.theinquirer.net/gb/inquirer/news/2008/04/24/eurocrats-study-microsoft-ooxml">Inquirer article</a></li> <li>original <a href="http://www.dkuug.dk/content/view/220/34/">complaint and rpress release</a></li> </ul> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
				</channel>
</rss>