<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wikidot="http://www.wikidot.com/rss-namespace">

	<channel>
		<title>Europe&#039;s not finished with Microsoft</title>
		<link>http://www.noooxml.org/forum/t-56240/europe-s-not-finished-with-microsoft</link>
		<description>Posts in the discussion thread &quot;Europe&#039;s not finished with Microsoft&quot; - A short summary of the history of Microsoft and the European Union. Closing remarks on the &quot;openness&quot; of OOXML are quite interesting.</description>
				<copyright></copyright>
		<lastBuildDate></lastBuildDate>
		
					<item>
				<guid>http://www.noooxml.org/forum/t-56240#post-153747</guid>
				<title>Europe&#039;s not finished with Microsoft</title>
				<link>http://www.noooxml.org/forum/t-56240/europe-s-not-finished-with-microsoft#post-153747</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 11:30:33 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>jwildeboer</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>92679</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>Richard Hillesley at ITPro writes about the competitive issues surrounding the Microsoft system and tells us at the final page of <a href="http://www.itpro.co.uk/features/191772/europes-not-finished-with-microsoft/page1.html">article</a>:</p> <blockquote> <p>"Proprietary protocols are anathema to network computing and a deliberate hindrance to innovation and competition in computing environments. Few of the players, or users, maintain the illusion that a Microsoft-only world is either desirable or attractive - and the accusations of ballot stuffing, bribery, and undue political influence that surrounded the acceptance of OOXML as a standard by the ISO has only served to emphasise this reality."</p> </blockquote> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
				</channel>
</rss>