<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wikidot="http://www.wikidot.com/rss-namespace">

	<channel>
		<title>7228 pages of ISO ooxml</title>
		<link>http://www.noooxml.org/forum/t-72029/7228-pages-of-iso-ooxml</link>
		<description>Posts in the discussion thread &quot;7228 pages of ISO ooxml&quot; - Opendocument Format saves our trees. ISO Open XML has been getting more and more fat.</description>
				<copyright></copyright>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 16:30:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		
					<item>
				<guid>http://www.noooxml.org/forum/t-72029#post-213184</guid>
				<title>7228 pages of ISO ooxml</title>
				<link>http://www.noooxml.org/forum/t-72029/7228-pages-of-iso-ooxml#post-213184</link>
				<description></description>
				<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 09:35:41 +0000</pubDate>
				<wikidot:authorName>arebenti</wikidot:authorName>				<wikidot:authorUserId>36024</wikidot:authorUserId>				<content:encoded>
					<![CDATA[
						 <p>The final text of OOXML was not published in time. A good reason for a complaint. Now jtc1 members apparently got the text.</p> <p>4 parts:<br /> part1: 5570 pages<br /> part2: 137 pages<br /> part3: 46 pages<br /> part4: 1475 pages</p> <hr /> <p>SUM: 7228 pages</p> <p>Guess how many pages the other format ODF 1.2 would comprise. It is estimated to become even shorter than the ODF 1.1 spec. Although they are adding material, they are also rewriting it to be much more concise and precise. So, probably around 700 pages in the end.</p> 
				 	]]>
				</content:encoded>							</item>
				</channel>
</rss>