China says ciao-ciao! to OOXML (one more <NO>)
Forum » News / Front-page » China says ciao-ciao! to OOXML (one more <NO>)
started by: rizoxrizox
on: 1186492644|%e %b %Y, %H:%M %Z|agohover
number of posts: 9
rss icon RSS: new posts
summary:
The experts and the enterprises of China, representing the interests of a one fifth of the Earth population and one of the biggest economical super-powers, have determined that ISO DIS 29500 should not become ISO 29500 because it severely lacks in converting former Chinese document and because "it will do harm to the country's overall software industry". China will be one more vote NO to the interests of Microsoft at ISO/IEC.
China says ciao-ciao! to OOXML (one more <NO>)
rizoxrizox 1186492644|%e %b %Y, %H:%M %Z|agohover

As reported by many news sites already, China has decided to reject the proposed standard format of Microsoft in ISO. China is a "P", principal, member of ISO, so its vote is an important one. And this is not taking in care what China represents for Asia and the whole world, and the reference that could represent for other countries.

It seems that OOXML has found a strong resistance among academics and local software enterprises that see it wrong adapted to the Chinese culture or indeed a competitor to the local economic interests. Facts as that OOXML is not able to represent URLs in Chinese characters (neither in any other non ANSI character), or facts as the Anglo-Saxon bias of the specification, or the use of only the centuries ago deprecated "Julian" calendar used by the Romans, makes it not suitable for many international markets as the Oriental ones, and specially the proud, old and savvy China.

Of course, Microsoft is making strong efforts to avoid that "no", as to launch a quick development of a "BSD"(!) licensed translator between OOXML and UOF. UOF is the Chinese proposed standard format for office documents that finally could merge with ODF, the only ISO recognized of all existing office document formats (PDF/A and PDF/X apart).

What is more interesting is that Microsoft is failing mostly in the big economical countries, getting the YES from some small ones with, usually, not so fair tactics. It did in USA already, and now China. Japan and India will follow surely and Canada, UK and Germany were among the countries that asked not to reach this DIS fast track stage in the ISO process because the many problems unveiled on the proposed OOXML specification, the extremely (and unnecessarily) complex and big proposal, and the contradiction with many preexisting ISO standards.

last edited on 1187113100|%e %b %Y, %H:%M %Z|agohover by rizox + show more
unfold China says ciao-ciao! to OOXML (one more <NO>) by rizoxrizox, 1186492644|%e %b %Y, %H:%M %Z|agohover
Re: China says ciao-ciao! to OOXML (one more <NO>)
Anonymous (213.193.162.x) 1186498695|%e %b %Y, %H:%M %Z|agohover

Ni Guangnan : Microsoft OOXML even as international standards was reasonable to resist

http://66.249.91.104/translate_c?hl=fr&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&langpair=zh%7Cen&u=http://www.cnetnews.com.cn/2007/0807/446574.shtml&prev=/language_tools

Freescale / Hu Yong only : little choice but to oppose the Microsoft document standards:

http://66.249.91.104/translate_c?hl=fr&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&langpair=zh%7Cen&u=http://www.lupaworld.com/viewnews_22714.html&prev=/language_tools

Liu Peng Gong Min : Microsoft standards others simply can not be implemented:

http://66.249.91.104/translate_c?hl=fr&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&langpair=zh%7Cen&u=http://www.lupaworld.com/viewnews_22718.html&prev=/language_tools

If China voted against Microsoft documentation facing Tim Chen to step down

http://66.249.91.104/translate_c?hl=fr&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&langpair=zh%7Cen&u=http://www.lupaworld.com/viewnews_22757.html&prev=/language_tools

Re: China says ciao-ciao! to OOXML (one more <NO>)
rizoxrizox 1186528084|%e %b %Y, %H:%M %Z|agohover

¡Gracias, "Anonymous"! :o)

unfold Re: China says ciao-ciao! to OOXML (one more <NO>) by rizoxrizox, 1186528084|%e %b %Y, %H:%M %Z|agohover
Re: China says ciao-ciao! to OOXML (one more <NO>)
Anonymous (221.39.206.x) 1187103090|%e %b %Y, %H:%M %Z|agohover

The Japan TC voted "No with comments" on July 31.

Re: China says ciao-ciao! to OOXML (one more <NO>)
rizoxrizox 1187113054|%e %b %Y, %H:%M %Z|agohover

Please, provide links to the news.

unfold Re: China says ciao-ciao! to OOXML (one more <NO>) by rizoxrizox, 1187113054|%e %b %Y, %H:%M %Z|agohover
Re: China says ciao-ciao! to OOXML (one more <NO>)
Anonymous (221.39.206.x) 1187186336|%e %b %Y, %H:%M %Z|agohover

http://www.xmlmaster.org/murata/xmlblog/xb070731.html

I don't think there will be an official press release from the Japanese SC34, and it may take a while for the minutes to come online.

Re: China says ciao-ciao! to OOXML (one more <NO>)
Anonymous (211.96.159.x) 1186707297|%e %b %Y, %H:%M %Z|agohover

Microsoft OOXML even as international standards was reasonable to resist

Re: China says ciao-ciao! to OOXML (one more <NO>)
plopezplopez 1191530936|%e %b %Y, %H:%M %Z|agohover

Why you don´t like http://www.ooxml.es

thkx

unfold Re: China says ciao-ciao! to OOXML (one more <NO>) by plopezplopez, 1191530936|%e %b %Y, %H:%M %Z|agohover
new post