Babies born on 29 February attacks Microsoft leap year bug
Forum » Submissions / Submit your news » Babies born on 29 February attacks Microsoft leap year bug
started by: zoobabzoobab
on: 1204302434|%e %b %Y, %H:%M %Z|agohover
number of posts: 1
rss icon RSS: new posts
summary:
Leap Year Babies born on 29 February are attacking Microsoft for trying to standardise their leap year bug in OOXML. I guess the leap year is still in the standard after the BRM because standards needs to be tailored for a large dominant vendor.
Babies born on 29 February attacks Microsoft leap year bug
zoobabzoobab 1204302434|%e %b %Y, %H:%M %Z|agohover
LG29lg.gif

The Microsoft's OOXML Leap Year Bug of 1900 is being attacked by a group of babies born on leap years, such as today 29 February:

Peter Brouwer, a spokesman for the Honor Society, says he's not surprised by the Invalid birth date bug, “Many Americans don't understand leap year – so why should the Internet?” Brouwer doesn't want to see a repeat of the leap year bug, which has taken over 20 years to correct. “In that bug, 1900 was counted as a leap year, even though it was not a leap year. Only recently has there been an agreement to fix the bug, when an international standards organization got involved. Brouwer says “We would be very proud if everyone used our software to fix their leap year bugs.“

What the press release does not tell us is if the 1900 bug is still in the OOXML specification after the BRM. I guess the leap year is still in the standard after the BRM because standards needs to be tailored for a large dominant vendor.

last edited on 1204302859|%e %b %Y, %H:%M %Z|agohover by zoobab + show more
unfold Babies born on 29 February attacks Microsoft leap year bug by zoobabzoobab, 1204302434|%e %b %Y, %H:%M %Z|agohover
new post