NoOOXML

Quoting Microsoft's Doug Mahugh ( he was talking about V1 stuffing accusations ):

"I contacted a couple of those partners myself, but I just picked up the phone and said "hey, there's this committee that is discussing Open XML but nobody involved has actually implemented it from the spec and the debate is therefore 100% theoretical, so it would be great if somebody like yourself with actual hands-on experience got involved."
(
http://blogs.msdn.com/dmahugh/archive/2007/08/30/oh-the-drama-of-it-all.aspx )

!!!!

Microsoft: What standard do you want to fast-track today? (tm)

This people ( V1 Microsoft members ) are rushing the standard, don't reviewing it. They don't care in final users, just want to keep doing business selling Microsoft products. It's shameful that ISO is subject of such "standardization by corporations".

The Microsoft partners ( they represent more than 70% of the total members ) , have voted an non inexistent text ( ECMA is reorganizing the text as multipart, changing conformance structure, changing XML examples, changing scope ! , applying proposed dispositions, removing redundant normative text, changing again the date system , etc, etc ), and it supposed that fast-tracked standards are pre-reviewed and mature.

Add to your list:

1. BP -> ECMA TC-45 (OOXML) member

2. Microsoft -> the OOXML "perpetrator" ( the father of the beast )

3. http://www.realitymobile.com/ Reality Mobile -> flagship product transmit real-time video and geospatial coordinates WHAT THIS HAVE TO DO WITH OFFICE DOCUMENT STANDARDS ( this "member" approved unconditionally last year without ever contributing any comment, now it seems that have gone from V1 , GOOD WORK !!! thanks for contributing to standardization )

4 http://www.fortifieddatacom.com/ Fortified DataCom: one of flagship products runs XP with MS Office, mentioned in [1] when the company was known as Z5 technologies"

[1] http://blogs.msdn.com/dmahugh/archive/2007/07/09/open-xml-solution-demonstration-at-wpc.aspx