The commercial value of ISO privileged access
Forum » News / Front-page » The commercial value of ISO privileged access
started by: arebentiarebenti
on: 1207142068|%e %b %Y, %H:%M %Z|agohover
number of posts: 2
rss icon RSS: new posts
summary:
Jan van den Beld 'sends love letters' to the ISO system and lashes out against parties who want to appeal.
The commercial value of ISO privileged access
arebentiarebenti 1207142068|%e %b %Y, %H:%M %Z|agohover

CompTIA lobbyist and ex-ECMA general secretary Jan van den Beld blogs about the value of the ISO system.

ECMA turned out to be a commercial means of privileged access to the ISO system and was totally captured. As many persons from his lobbying side he also takes the DIN press release as a means of counter-attack:

This would follow on the heels of the false claims by the opponents of Open XML adoption of irregularities in the NB process essentially anywhere the NBs voted against their interests. For example, we have seen them attack reputable organizations like the DIN of Germany who took the unusual action of putting out a press release to respond to the manufactured “controversy” with a statement that says reports currently circulating on the web about the voting procedures conducted in connection with the ISO/IEC DIS 29500 Office Open XML are “wrong and misleading.”

Indeed the misconception was that the vote was not about the standard but about the regularity of the procedure. This message was covered by all sides of the debate and esp. print journalism. The result of the vote 7:6 sounds convincing, DIN formally decided everything was right and no formal reasons could be found to overturn the national decision. In fact no "controversy" was manufactured but the very controversy was subject to the vote.

Soon, however, we will know how far they are willing to go with the scorched earth campaign if, after the final ballot results, you see calls for appeals in JTC 1, from these companies or their allies.

Indeed, we can expect that all these appeals will be overturned. This is no reason to abstain from using these legitimate means.

last edited on 1207145192|%e %b %Y, %H:%M %Z|agohover by arebenti + show more
unfold The commercial value of ISO privileged access by arebentiarebenti, 1207142068|%e %b %Y, %H:%M %Z|agohover
Re: The commercial value of ISO privileged access
stegustegu 1207143943|%e %b %Y, %H:%M %Z|agohover

from these companies or their allies

This annoying practice of insinuating covert liaisons between any OOXML opponent and IBM, Sun and other commercial actors supporting ODF is getting really old by now. I resent being associated with any company whatsoever in this, I make my own decisions and I have chosen to oppose the obvious oppression, abuse and misconduct by Microsoft, without any commercial interest either way.

The OOXML spokespeople seems to be totally unable to understand that anyone can oppose OOXML and the recent abuse of the ISO process in and by itself, without having ties to any specific company. Perhaps that is because they have been paid off by Microsoft, and don't want to see that they have been playing for the wrong team, the team which has to buy both its players and its supporters?

last edited on 1207144918|%e %b %Y, %H:%M %Z|agohover by zoobab + show more
unfold Re: The commercial value of ISO privileged access by stegustegu, 1207143943|%e %b %Y, %H:%M %Z|agohover
new post