Microsoft recycles its lobby platform "Voices for Innovation" to lobby against Open Source software
Forum » News / Front-page » Microsoft recycles its lobby platform "Voices for Innovation" to lobby against Open Source software
started by: zoobabzoobab
on: 1222160591|%e %b %Y, %H:%M %Z|agohover
number of posts: 6
rss icon RSS: new posts
summary:
Microsoft recycles its lobby platform "Voices for Innovation" to lobby against Open Source software in the European Parliament systems. Over the past few weeks radical elements in the open source community have intensified their efforts in the European Parliament.
Microsoft recycles its lobby platform "Voices for Innovation" to lobby against Open Source software
zoobabzoobab 1222160591|%e %b %Y, %H:%M %Z|agohover

Microsoft lobby plafform "Voices for Innovation", which is managed by APCO (a well-known lobby firm of which Microsoft is a client) and which was used during the OOXML fiasco, has sent an alert to their corporate members asking them to lobby against a parliamentary resolution led by Rocard-Cotigny-Geremek-Geremek, which is asking to migrate the European Parliament systems to FLOSS, and to give some funds for R&D of open source products in Europe. Here is the mail:

From: Voices for Innovation [mailto:eu@voicesforinnovation.info]
Sent: 22. september 2008
Subject: Policy Alert: Open Source activists secure close to 100 signatures in effort to mandate OSS

Open Source activists secure close to 100 signatures in effort to mandate OSS

Over the past few weeks radical elements in the open source community have intensified their efforts in the European Parliament. They are attempting to significantly change the existing public procurement framework, which follows a policy of technology neutrality, by introducing an open source software preference.

The Parliament’s current approach reflects a much more balanced view, as it uses both proprietary and open source technology. The Members of the European Parliament (MEPs overseeing the Parliament’s IT spending follow the clear line that the Parliament’s IT procurement choices must be based on reasonable and objective criteria, such as “interoperability, cost/value for money, reliability, vendor support, ease of use and security”, thus ensuring the best value for tax payers money. If the Parliament moves away from this established policy we must fear that the choice available to both citizens and institutions will be significantly reduced, limiting the functionality and user-friendliness of the European Parliament’s portals.

Next week their efforts will intensify further, as they are planning to approach Members of the European Parliament with the view of signing and supporting a draft entitled “Written Declaration on the use of Open-source software”. The draft has been tabled for consideration by MEPs in May and calls on the Parliament to migrate its entire computer network to Open Source software as a means to tackle the digital divide in Europe. Open Source proponents need to collect signatures of the 50% +1 Members of the European Parliament by next Thursday. At the moment they are far from reaching that number – clearly as many of the MEPs have seen through the ploy of masking an attempt to change the procurement policy of an institution, with a cause benefiting the disadvantaged members of our society.

It is unclear how the proponents of this draft Declaration draw a link between implementing an ‘Open-source software only’ policy in the European Parliament and confronting the challenges of the digital divide. The major challenges of the digital divide are widely regarded to be the consequence of limited access, poverty, social exclusion, personal factors (age, disability) or education and skills gaps. The exclusion of proprietary software models could potentially result in a significant increase of people without access to technology – thus achieving the exact opposite of what they set out to do - increasing the digital divide in Europe.

In order to address these challenges, governments, industry (including proprietary and OSS vendors) and civil society are already working together to drive greater awareness of the benefits of technology and investing in e-skills and education across the populations – see for example the European Alliance on Skills for Employability. The main goal of the Alliance is to help better co-ordinate industry and community investments, services and other offerings, dialogue and engagement with NGOs and public authorities in a way that enhances the positive impact of ICT literacy and professional training on employability prospects of the young, the disabled, older workers and other unemployed or under-employed people throughout the European Union – thereby seeking to address the digital divide.

The Written declaration therefore falls short of doing anything about its stated objective. In fact it does something much more radical, which many of the ones signing it might well not have been aware of – it drastically changes the procurement policies of European institutions, effectively excluding all but OSS solutions from its use.

Should you be interested in presenting an opinion to your local Member of Parliament please contact ofni.noitavonnirofseciov|ue#ofni.noitavonnirofseciov|ue

More information will be posted up on the following website https://www.voicesforinnovation.org/

Links to the written declaration can be found on the European Commission’s website http://osor.eu/news/meps-petition-european-parliament-switch-to-open-source

Here is the resolution in plain text:

EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT
2004- 2009

19.5.2008

0046/2008

WRITTEN DECLARATION
pursuant to Rule 116 of the Rules of Procedure by Jean Louis Cottigny, Pierre Pribetich, Michel Rocard, Bronisław Geremek and Daniel Cohn-Bendit on the use of open source software

Lapse date: 25.9.2008

DC\721370EN.doc
PE406.962v01-00
EN

0046/2008 Written declaration on the use of open source software

The European Parliament, – having regard to Rule 116 of its Rules of Procedure,

A. having regard to the growing disparities in access to information and communication technologies in the European Union, reflected in the establishment of a digital divide, a new cause of social disparity which further excludes an already vulnerable population,

B. whereas these new technologies have become an essential tool in areas as varied as employment, education, information etc.,

C. whereas European citizens have the inalienable right freely to access documents and information from the institutions which represent them,

D. whereas the use of open source software is one of the effective ways of reducing this digital divide and whereas this solution, established by some Member States in their administrations, delivers significant results,

1. Calls on the European Union to take the necessary measures to help finance public research on open source software;

2. Calls for Parliament to switch its whole computer network to this type of software;

3. Instructs its President to forward this declaration, together with the names of the signatories, to the parliaments of the Member States, the Council and the Commission, so that they may join forces on this measure.

Re: Microsoft recycles its lobby platform "Voices for Innovation" to lobby against Open Source software
arebentiarebenti 1222427439|%e %b %Y, %H:%M %Z|agohover

The funny thing about the resolution is that no one actually lobbied for it. It is quite difficult to get these sign up resolutions adopted and it hardly happens. I was made aware 23 September of the resolution. Everyone who pushed for the resolution was involved with the Telecom package. The European Parliament is very open source friendly but we don't have real lobbying. Basically because the open source business does not significantly invest in Brussels representation. What was adopted this week:

52. Calls on the Commission to conduct a study on conflicts between users of open source software and certification authorities concerning software defined radios;

One point strikes me in the V4I text

It is unclear how the proponents of this draft Declaration draw a link between implementing an ‘Open-source software only’ policy in the European Parliament and confronting the challenges of the digital divide. The major challenges of the digital divide are widely regarded to be the consequence of limited access, poverty, social exclusion, personal factors (age, disability) or education and skills gaps. The exclusion of proprietary software models could potentially result in a significant increase of people without access to technology – thus achieving the exact opposite of what they set out to do - increasing the digital divide in Europe.

Actually I always do question that a digital divide exists. These V4I guys spread this leftys misconception about digital media development. The "digital divide" is a UN-level political lie which perpetuates the old divide discourse and transfers it to electronic media. It works because the underlying narrative is accepted but still unscientific from the perspective of critical rationalism. You cannot falsify the existance of a Digital Divide. It is political folklore similar to references to the Lisbon agenda to hack into these general principles some MEPs do agree with or at least pretend to.

When you know how a parliament discourse works you become aware how foolish the V4I criticism is from a professional lobbying standpoint while I sympathise with the call for clarity of parliament documents. "unclear how the proponents… draw a link between implementing an ‘Open-source software only’ policy in the European Parliament and confronting the challenges of the digital divide" You raise the points of your interest opponents and create awareness. It is very difficult to win a debate this way. The whole V4I advocacy shows how well project Domino works. And then there is this:

Over the past few weeks radical elements [Rocard and the xx other MEPs? Huh?] in the open source community have intensified their efforts in the European Parliament. [not that I am aware of] They are attempting to significantly change the existing public procurement framework, which follows a policy of technology neutrality, by introducing an open source software preference.

Check the source. To my great surprise there is no such preference demanded. As far as I know there is neither a preference nor technological neutrality in the current framework. So why is V4I sock puppeting? When you look carefully at the text you see that it is not about general procurement policy:

1. Calls on the European Union to take the necessary measures to help finance public research on open source software;
2. Calls for Parliament to switch its whole computer network to this type of software;

So it only relates to the user demand to adopt open source for the parliament administration. Unfortunately Microsoft does not offer an open source operating system but it could. And here I stress the principles of the WTO GPA:

[Public] Entities shall not seek or accept, in a manner which would have the effect of precluding competition, advice which may be used in the preparation of specifications for a specific procurement from a firm that may have a commercial interest in the procurement.

What software parliament procures or not is the decision of these users and vendors have to abstain from interventions in customer deliberations. Here the V4I could be perceived as an astroturf circumvention of the WTO principles.

last edited on 1222430067|%e %b %Y, %H:%M %Z|agohover by arebenti + show more
Re: Microsoft recycles its lobby platform "Voices for Innovation" to lobby against Open Source software
stegustegu 1222455224|%e %b %Y, %H:%M %Z|agohover

The exclusion of proprietary software models could potentially result in a significant increase of people without access to technology

I completely fail to see how this could happen. Could anyone sketch me a possible scenario? If a proprietary solution were to be abandoned in favor of a free and open solution, exactly who could lose access to that technology?

To me, this statement rings like "Free software might kill your puppy".

last edited on 1222455659|%e %b %Y, %H:%M %Z|agohover by stegu + show more
Re: Microsoft recycles its lobby platform "Voices for Innovation" to lobby against Open Source software
arebentiarebenti 1222456793|%e %b %Y, %H:%M %Z|agohover

Right now there is a great concern with parliament streams which indeed discriminate users of non-Windows Media player solutions. Check it out

Discrimination of proprietary software is an argument you just cannot win, so it is funny that they raise awareness for platform neutrality.

Re: Microsoft recycles its lobby platform "Voices for Innovation" to lobby against Open Source software
zoobabzoobab 1223379682|%e %b %Y, %H:%M %Z|agohover

whois voicesforinnovation.org:

Domain ID:D117910110-LROR
Domain Name:VOICESFORINNOVATION.ORG
Created On:06-Mar-2006 23:49:37 UTC
Last Updated On:14-Nov-2007 00:21:24 UTC
Expiration Date:06-Mar-2009 23:49:37 UTC
Sponsoring Registrar:Tucows Inc. (R11-LROR)
Status:CLIENT TRANSFER PROHIBITED
Status:CLIENT UPDATE PROHIBITED
Registrant ID:tukvECSsFENx3T2h
Registrant Name:Microsoft Corporation
Registrant Organization:Microsoft Corporation
Registrant Street1:1 Microsoft Way
Registrant Street2:
Registrant Street3:
Registrant City:Redmond
Registrant State/Province:WA
Registrant Postal Code:98052
Registrant Country:US
Registrant Phone:+1.4258828080
Registrant Phone Ext.:
Registrant FAX:
Registrant FAX Ext.:
Registrant Email:moc.tfosorcim|sniamod#moc.tfosorcim|sniamod
Admin ID:tuDL7uzFQ4dKhN7B
Admin Name:Domain Administrator
Admin Organization:Microsoft Corporation
Admin Street1:1 Microsoft Way
Admin Street2:
Admin Street3:
Admin City:Redmond
Admin State/Province:WA
Admin Postal Code:98052
Admin Country:US
Admin Phone:+1.4258828080
Admin Phone Ext.:
Admin FAX:
Admin FAX Ext.:
Admin Email:moc.tfosorcim|sniamod#moc.tfosorcim|sniamod
Tech ID:tujg0bTKBMc8dcAJ
Tech Name:MSN Hostmaster
Tech Organization:Microsoft Corporation
Tech Street1:1 Microsoft Way
Tech Street2:
Tech Street3:
Tech City:Redmond
Tech State/Province:WA
Tech Postal Code:98052
Tech Country:US
Tech Phone:+1.4258828080
Tech Phone Ext.:
Tech FAX:
Tech FAX Ext.:
Tech Email:moc.tfosorcim|tshnsm#moc.tfosorcim|tshnsm
Name Server:NS1.MSFT.NET
Name Server:NS5.MSFT.NET
Name Server:NS2.MSFT.NET
Name Server:NS3.MSFT.NET
Name Server:NS4.MSFT.NET

Re: Microsoft recycles its lobby platform "Voices for Innovation" to lobby against Open Source software
zoobabzoobab 1223379775|%e %b %Y, %H:%M %Z|agohover

whois voicesforinnovation.com

Registrars.Registrant:
Microsoft Corporation
1 Microsoft Way
Redmond, Wa 98052
US

Domain name: VOICESFORINNOVATION.COM

Administrative Contact:
Corporation, Microsoft MOC.TFOSORCIM|SNIAMOD#MOC.TFOSORCIM|SNIAMOD
One Microsoft Way
Redmond, WA 98052
US
+1.4258828080
Technical Contact:
Corporation, Microsoft moc.tfosorcim|tshnsm#moc.tfosorcim|tshnsm
One Microsoft Way
Redmond, Wa 98052
US
+1.4258828080

Registration Service Provider:
DBMS VeriSign, moc.ngisirev|troppus-smbd#moc.ngisirev|troppus-smbd
800-579-2848 x4
Please contact DBMS VeriSign for domain updates, DNS/Nameserver
changes, and general domain support questions.

Registrar of Record: TUCOWS, INC.
Record last updated on 16-Dec-2007.
Record expires on 06-Mar-2009.
Record created on 06-Mar-2006.

Registrar Domain Name Help Center:
http://domainhelp.tucows.com

Domain servers in listed order:
NS2.MSFT.NET
NS4.MSFT.NET
NS1.MSFT.NET
NS5.MSFT.NET
NS3.MSFT.NET

new post